You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Osteomielite de punho em paciente com paracoccidioidomicose disseminada: uma rara apresentação
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiologia Brasileira, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-39842012000400013 |
| Authors |
Juliana Santos Bayerl, André Ribeiro Nogueira de Oliveira, Paulo Mendes Peçanha, Aloísio Falqueto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 40% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Radiologia Brasileira
#52
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,303
of 187,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiologia Brasileira
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them