You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mono and diterpenes from seeds of Xylopia sericea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Química Nova, October 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-40422001000500008 |
| Authors |
Jacqueline A. Takahashi, Henriete S. Vieira, Maria Amélia D. Boaventura, James R. Hanson, Peter B. Hitchcock, Alaíde B. de Oliveira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Química Nova
#88
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,239
of 44,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Química Nova
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them