You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
QUALIS: Quo Vadis?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Química Nova, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-40422009000100001 |
Authors |
Jailson B. de Andrade, Fernando Galembeck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 13% |
Portugal | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 27% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 27% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,402,012
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Química Nova
#12
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,234
of 183,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Química Nova
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.