↓ Skip to main content

The pre-history of cryoscopy: what was done before raoult?

Overview of attention for article published in Química Nova, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The pre-history of cryoscopy: what was done before raoult?
Published in
Química Nova, January 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0100-40422009000600056
Authors

Simón Reif-Acherman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 35%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 24%
Engineering 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Química Nova
#88
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,780
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Química Nova
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.