You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of a molecular method for detection and identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. viticola
|
---|---|
Published in |
Summa Phytopathologica, March 2007
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-54052007000100002 |
Authors |
Loiselene Carvalho da Trindade, Eder Marques, Daniela Biaggioni Lopes, Marisa Álvares da Silva Velloso Ferreira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Uganda | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 37% |
Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Summa Phytopathologica
#13
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,047
of 89,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Summa Phytopathologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them