You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tratamento não operatório de lesão esplênica grau IV é seguro usando-se rígido protocolo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-69912013000400012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thaís Marconi Fernandes, Alcir Escocia Dorigatti, Bruno Monteiro T. Pereira, José Cruvinel Neto, Thiago Messias Zago, Gustavo Pereira Fraga |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 43% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,702,587
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#109
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,587
of 198,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them