You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anatomical techniques in the animal anatomy practice teaching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-736x2013000500022 |
| Authors |
Fabio Sergio Cury, Julia Barrionuevo Censoni, Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,778,071
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira
#24
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,350
of 206,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them