You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Análise de crescimento de Digitaria insularis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta Daninha, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-83582006000400004 |
| Authors |
A.F.L. Machado, L.R. Ferreira, F.A. Ferreira, C.M.T. Fialho, L.D. Tuffi Santos, M.S. Machado |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 50% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,647,032
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Planta Daninha
#25
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,288
of 254,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta Daninha
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them