You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of growth retardants in wheat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta Daninha, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-83582009000200022 |
| Authors |
M.C. Espindula, V.S. Rocha, J.A.S. Grossi, M.A. Souza, L.T. Souza, L.F. Favarato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,588,963
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Planta Daninha
#25
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,201
of 122,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta Daninha
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them