↓ Skip to main content

Interactions of laminin with the amyloid ß peptide: Implications for Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions of laminin with the amyloid ß peptide: Implications for Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, May 2001
DOI 10.1590/s0100-879x2001000500006
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Morgan, N.C. Inestrosa

Abstract

Extensive neuronal cell loss is observed in Alzheimer's disease. Laminin immunoreactivity colocalizes with senile plaques, the characteristic extracellular histopathological lesions of Alzheimer brain, which consist of the amyloid beta (A(beta)) peptide polymerized into amyloid fibrils. These lesions have neurotoxic effects and have been proposed to be a main cause of neurodegeneration. In order to understand the pathological significance of the interaction between laminin and amyloid, we investigated the effect of laminin on amyloid structure and toxicity. We found that laminin interacts with the A(beta)1-40 peptide, blocking fibril formation and even inducing depolymerization of preformed fibrils. Protofilaments known to be intermediate species of A(beta) fibril formation were also detected as intermediate species of laminin-induced A(beta) fibril depolymerization. Moreover, laminin-amyloid interactions inhibited the toxic effects on rat primary hippocampal neurons. As a whole, our results indicate a putative anti-amyloidogenic role of laminin which may be of biological and therapeutic interest for controlling amyloidosis, such as those observed in cerebral angiopathy and Alzheimer's disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Neuroscience 6 12%
Engineering 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#294
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,306
of 42,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.