↓ Skip to main content

Effects of caffeine on learning and memory in rats tested in the Morris water maze

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of caffeine on learning and memory in rats tested in the Morris water maze
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, October 2002
DOI 10.1590/s0100-879x2002001000013
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.E.M. Angelucci, C. Cesário, R.H. Hiroi, P.L. Rosalen, C. Da Cunha

Abstract

We studied some of the characteristics of the improving effect of the non-specific adenosine receptor antagonist, caffeine, using an animal model of learning and memory. Groups of 12 adult male Wistar rats receiving caffeine (0.3-30 mg/kg, ip, in 0.1 ml/100 g body weight) administered 30 min before training, immediately after training, or 30 min before the test session were tested in the spatial version of the Morris water maze task. Post-training administration of caffeine improved memory retention at the doses of 0.3-10 mg/kg (the rats swam up to 600 cm less to find the platform in the test session, P<=0.05) but not at the dose of 30 mg/kg. Pre-test caffeine administration also caused a small increase in memory retrieval (the escape path of the rats was up to 500 cm shorter, P<=0.05). In contrast, pre-training caffeine administration did not alter the performance of the animals either in the training or in the test session. These data provide evidence that caffeine improves memory retention but not memory acquisition, explaining some discrepancies among reports in the literature.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 31%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Researcher 17 10%
Professor 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 22%
Neuroscience 21 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,655,931
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#52
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,058
of 50,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them