You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Method for automatic detection of wheezing in lung sounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-879x2009000700013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R.J. Riella, P. Nohama, J.M. Maia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 38 | 38% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#152
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,048
of 122,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them