↓ Skip to main content

The response of social anxiety disorder patients to threat scenarios differs from that of healthy controls

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The response of social anxiety disorder patients to threat scenarios differs from that of healthy controls
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, October 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0100-879x2011007500137
Pubmed ID
Authors

S.C.V. Mesquita, R. Shuhama, F.L. Osório, J.A.S. Crippa, S.R. Loureiro, J. Landeira-Fernandez, F.G. Graeff, C.M. Del-Ben

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the response of social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients to threat scenarios. First-choice responses to 12 scenarios describing conspecific threatening situations and mean scores of defensive direction and defensive intensity dimensions were compared between 87 SAD patients free of medication and 87 matched healthy controls (HC). A significant gender difference in the first-choice responses was identified for seven scenarios among HCs but only for two scenarios among SAD patients. A significantly higher proportion of SAD patients chose "freezing" in response to "Bush" and "Noise" scenarios, whereas the most frequent response by HCs to these scenarios was "check out". SAD males chose "run away" and "yell" more often than healthy men in response to the scenarios "Park" and "Elevator", respectively. There was a positive correlation between the severity of symptoms and both defensive direction and defensive intensity dimensions. Factorial analysis confirmed the gradient of defensive reactions derived from animal studies. SAD patients chose more urgent defensive responses to threat scenarios, seeming to perceive them as more dangerous than HCs and tending to move away from the source of threat. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the physiopathology of anxiety disorders involves brain structures responsible for defensive behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#648
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,256
of 151,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.