↓ Skip to main content

Pré-eclâmpsia (indicador de doença renal crônica): da gênese aos riscos futuros

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pré-eclâmpsia (indicador de doença renal crônica): da gênese aos riscos futuros
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, March 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0101-28002012000100015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thais Alquezar Facca, Gianna Mastroianni Kirsztajn, Nelson Sass

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific disease which, in addition to other hypertensive disorders, is an important cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. With an incidence ranging from 3 to 14% of all pregnancies worldwide, the disease can present in different clinical forms. PE and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have similar pathophysiological mechanisms, such as endothelial dysfunction, metabolic changes and oxidative stress, and they also share some risk factors such as obesity, kidney disease and diabetes. Although the exact relationship between PE and cardiovascular risk has not been fully elucidated, PE-triggered metabolic stress may cause vascular injury, thus contributing to the development of CVD and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the future. This risk appears to be increased especially in women with a history of recurrent, severe PE and eclampsia. The investigation of a history of PE may assist in assessing the future risk of CVD and CKD, their prevention and early diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#21,011,157
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#285
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,929
of 169,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.