↓ Skip to main content

Myth, method and history: the Russian Revolution through the eyes of Maurício Tragtenberg

Overview of attention for article published in Educação & Sociedade, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myth, method and history: the Russian Revolution through the eyes of Maurício Tragtenberg
Published in
Educação & Sociedade, February 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0101-73302008000400003
Authors

Doris Accioly e Silva, Lucia Bruno

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Educação & Sociedade
#98
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,824
of 188,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educação & Sociedade
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them