↓ Skip to main content

A review of the New World Chlidanotini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the New World Chlidanotini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae)
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, June 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0101-81751999000400024
Authors

Józef Razowski, Vitor Osmar Becker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 11%
United Kingdom 1 5%
France 1 5%
Portugal 1 5%
Unknown 14 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 42%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 89%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,595,692
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zoologia
#5
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,375
of 122,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zoologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.