You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Infecção natural por Entamoeba histolytica Schaudinn, 1903 em Euphractus sexcinctus (tatu) mantidos em cativeiro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-09352000000300004 |
| Authors |
C.A. Soares, J.B. Oliveira, M.D.C. Brito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2016.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#125
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,150
of 39,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.