You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of two coprological methods for the veterinary diagnosis of fasciolosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-09352005000200007 |
| Authors |
F. Kleiman, S. Pietrokovsky, S. Gil, C. Wisnivesky-Colli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 33% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#4
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,528
of 68,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them