You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reconstrução do ligamento cruzado cranial em cães, associado ou não ao sulfato de condroitina
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, October 2005
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-09352005000400004 |
Authors |
F. Biasi, S.C. Rahal, R.S. Volpi, J.L. Sequeira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#24
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,367
of 71,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.