You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalência da filariose canina causada por Dirofilaria immitis e Dipetalonema reconditum em Maceió, Alagoas, Brasil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-311x2001000600021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Cristina Brito, Márcio Cavalcante Vila-Nova, Deisy Alécia Martins Rocha, Lidiana Gomes Costa, Wendell Alexandre Pinheiro de Almeida, Luciana da Silva Viana, Ricardo Ramalho Lopes, Gilberto Fontes, Eliana Maria Maurício da Rocha, Lêda Regis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 20% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,322
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,255
of 49,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.