↓ Skip to main content

Debate on the paper by David Waltner-Toews

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Debate on the paper by David Waltner-Toews
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, August 2006
DOI 10.1590/s0102-311x2001000700006
Authors

Cristina de Albuquerque Possas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#444
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,394
of 91,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.