↓ Skip to main content

Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, November 2006
DOI 10.1590/s0102-311x2006001300002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celia Almeida, Ernesto Báscolo

Abstract

This paper offers a critical review of the theoretical literature on the relationship between the production of scientific knowledge and its use in policy formulation and implementation. Extensive academic output, using a diversity of approaches and analytical frameworks, has sought to systematize knowledge transfer categories and strategies with a view to improving the application of scientific knowledge. A considerable part of this thinking addresses the problem from a more traditional perspective, which (explicitly or implicitly) regards research results as an "accumulable product", depicts the decision-making process simplistically and linearly, and thus restricts strategies to the suiting of research endeavors to needs. Newer approaches place greater importance on the complexity of policymaking and the knowledge production process, which are integrated into and explained in particular political and institutional settings. Although the application of knowledge transfer ideas to health policy and systems research does generate some interesting contributions, a long process of theoretical thinking lies ahead.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 230 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 18%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Professor 12 5%
Other 53 22%
Unknown 39 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 74 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 4%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 52 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,382
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,016
of 87,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.