↓ Skip to main content

Effect of psychological stress on blood pressure increase: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of psychological stress on blood pressure increase: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, April 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0102-311x2009000400002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Gasperin, Gopalakrishnan Netuveli, Juvenal Soares Dias-da-Costa, Marcos Pascoal Pattussi

Abstract

Studies have suggested that chronic exposure to stress may have an influence on increased blood pressure. A systematic review followed by a meta-analysis was conducted aiming to assess the effect of psychological stress on blood pressure increase. Research was mainly conducted in Ingenta, Psycinfo, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were: published in any language; from January 1970 to December 2006; prospective cohort design; adults; main exposure psychological/emotional stress; outcome arterial hypertension or blood pressure increase > 3.5mmHg. A total of 2,043 studies were found, of which 110 were cohort studies. Of these, six were eligible and yielded 23 comparison groups and 34,556 subjects. Median follow-up time and loss to follow-up were 11.5 years and 21%. Results showed individuals who had stronger responses to stressor tasks were 21% more likely to develop blood pressure increase when compared to those with less strong responses (OR: 1.21; 95%CI: 1.14-1.28; p < 0.001). Although the magnitude of effect was relatively small, results suggest the relevance of the control of psychological stress to the non-therapeutic management of high blood pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 227 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 21%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Psychology 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 48 21%
Unknown 65 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#270
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,556
of 107,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them