↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of self-reported weight, height and body mass index from telephone interviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of self-reported weight, height and body mass index from telephone interviews
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, February 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0102-311x2010000100012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandra Lucca, Erly Catarina Moura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#444
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,578
of 102,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them