You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) for diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder according to DSM-IV criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-311x2012000700009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Inês Quintana, Jair de Jesus Mari, Wagner Silva Ribeiro, Miguel Roberto Jorge, Sergio Baxter Andreoli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 89% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 89% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,753,240
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#310
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,331
of 176,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.