↓ Skip to main content

The theories of social movements: a review of the debate

Overview of attention for article published in Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The theories of social movements: a review of the debate
Published in
Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, October 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0102-64452009000100003
Authors

Angela Alonso

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 3%
Unknown 334 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 22%
Student > Bachelor 53 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Researcher 22 6%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 72 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 191 55%
Arts and Humanities 31 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 5%
Environmental Science 11 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 1%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 69 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#74
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,599
of 106,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them