↓ Skip to main content

Estudo botanico e chimico da catuaba (Erythroxylaceae Catuaba do Norte)

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estudo botanico e chimico da catuaba (Erythroxylaceae Catuaba do Norte)
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, January 2004
DOI 10.1590/s0102-695x2004000100009
Authors

Arthur José da Silva

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#98
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,568
of 143,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them