You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avaliação clínica e laboratorial do gel da Uncaria tomentosa (Unha de Gato) sobre candidose oral
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-695x2009000300015 |
| Authors |
Leonardo Costa de Almeida Paiva, Rodrigo Alves Ribeiro, Jozinete Vieira Pereira, Neuza Maria Cavalcante Oliveira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#98
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,097
of 125,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.