You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of bioassays using the anostracan crustaceans Artemia salina and Thamnocephalus platyurus for plant extract toxicity screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-695x2010005000029 |
Authors |
Pablo Mayorga, Karen R. Pérez, Sully M. Cruz, Armando Cáceres |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 24% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 8% |
Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#37
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,629
of 190,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.