↓ Skip to main content

Immediate postoperative evaluation of enteric anastomosis after the use of meloxicam in rats1

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immediate postoperative evaluation of enteric anastomosis after the use of meloxicam in rats1
Published in
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira, May 2016
DOI 10.1590/s0102-865020160050000005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eros Luiz de Sousa, Antônio Felipe Paulino de Figueiredo Wouk, Osvaldo Malafaia, Jurandir Marcondes Ribas-Filho, Lucia Noronha, Silvana Maris Cirio, Claudia Turra PimpãoVII, Carlos Hespanha Marinho, Maria Fernanda Torres, Yorgos Luiz Santos de Salles Graça, Daniel Dantas Ferrarin

Abstract

To compare ileal anastomoses in the immediate postoperative healing period after meloxicam use. Forty two male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups of 21, COX and control group. To COX meloxicam in combination with morphine was given in 3 days period. Control group received only morphine during the same period. Each group was divided into three sub-groups of 7, which were euthanized at 5, 10, and 21 days postoperatively. Comparison was based in histological evaluation of collagen type I and III using sirius red, immunohistochemical through vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-9. Healing process in scheduled periods did not show significant differences (p>0.05) between the COX and control groups during any of the periods. The use of meloxicam in the postoperative period following ileal anastomosis did not affect healing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%