↓ Skip to main content

Unroofed coronary sinus in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unroofed coronary sinus in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0103-05822013000400019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciano Pereira Bender, Maria Rita F. Meyer, Rafael Fabiano M. Rosa, Rosana Cardoso M. Rosa, Patrícia Trevisan, Paulo Ricardo G. Zen

Abstract

To report the uncommon association between neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and unroofed coronary sinus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#274
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,688
of 320,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.