↓ Skip to main content

Entrevista com Christian Baudelot e Roger Establet

Overview of attention for article published in Tempo Social, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Entrevista com Christian Baudelot e Roger Establet
Published in
Tempo Social, January 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0103-20702008000100009
Authors

Ana Maria F. Almeida

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 73%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Tempo Social
#54
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,438
of 168,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tempo Social
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.