↓ Skip to main content

The aesthetics of conversion: the Engenho de Dentro studio and concrete art in Rio de Janeiro (1946-1951)

Overview of attention for article published in Tempo Social, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The aesthetics of conversion: the Engenho de Dentro studio and concrete art in Rio de Janeiro (1946-1951)
Published in
Tempo Social, November 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0103-20702008000200010
Authors

Glaucia Villas Bôas

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Tempo Social
#54
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,392
of 105,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tempo Social
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.