↓ Skip to main content

Razões emergentes para a validade dos estudos de caso na ciência política comparada

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Razões emergentes para a validade dos estudos de caso na ciência política comparada
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, July 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0103-33522011000200012
Authors

Flávio da Cunha Rezende

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 36 73%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
#167
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,656
of 177,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.