↓ Skip to main content

THE GAME BETWEEN ELITES AND INSTITUIONS: the political strategies of ACM Neto and his carlista tradition

Overview of attention for article published in Caderno CRH, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 161)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
THE GAME BETWEEN ELITES AND INSTITUIONS: the political strategies of ACM Neto and his carlista tradition
Published in
Caderno CRH, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/s0103-49792017000200003
Authors

Carla Galvão Pereira

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Caderno CRH
#24
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,278
of 324,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Caderno CRH
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.