You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mesoporous carbons prepared by nano-casting with meso- or non-porous silica nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0103-50532006000600015 |
| Authors |
Camila Ramos da Silva, Martin Wallau, Ernesto A. Urquieta-González |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Professor | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 16 | 50% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#46
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,622
of 88,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.