↓ Skip to main content

Flavonoids of Lotus tenuis (Waldst.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flavonoids of Lotus tenuis (Waldst. & Kit.) as markers of populations growing in soils of different saline and hydrologic conditions
Published in
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0103-50532010000900021
Authors

Graciela Ferraro, Filip Rosana, María A. del Pero, Norma Basualdo, Rodolfo Mendoza, Ileana García

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Chemistry 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#133
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,122
of 172,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.