You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New neolignans from Krameria tomentosa A. St. -Hil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0103-50532012005000077 |
| Authors |
Sara A. L. Madeiro, Hellane F. S. de Lucena, Caroline D. Siqueira, Marcelo C. Duarte, Raimundo Braz-Filho, José M. Barbosa Filho, Marcelo S. da Silva, Josean F. Tavares |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#46
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,631
of 202,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them