↓ Skip to main content

The use of therapeutic letters in the clinical context

Overview of attention for article published in Psicologia Clínica, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of therapeutic letters in the clinical context
Published in
Psicologia Clínica, July 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0103-56652012000100013
Authors

Ludoana Pousa Corrêa de Paiva, Emerson Fernando Rasera

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 22%
Unspecified 3 13%
Linguistics 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia Clínica
#37
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,694
of 178,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia Clínica
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.