You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative study of tubular diameter and quantity for human and bovine dentin at different depths
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Dental Journal, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0103-64402009000400003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Murilo Baena Lopes, Mário A. C. Sinhoreti, Alcides Gonini Júnior, Simonides Consani, John F. Mccabe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 37% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,139,045
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#8
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,544
of 165,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them