You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Epidemiological, clinical, etiological and histopatological evaluation of delayed enzootic ataxia outbreaks in kids and lambs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, August 2006
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-84782006000400025 |
Authors |
Néria Vania Marcos dos Santos, Jorge Eduardo de Souza Sarkis, José Luiz Guerra, Paulo Cesar Maiorka, Marcos Antonio Hortelani, Francisco Feliciano da Silva, Enrico Lippi Ortolani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 50% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#179
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,663
of 90,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.