You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linfadenectomia laparoscópica em cadela com neoplasia mamária
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ciência Rural, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0103-84782013005000028 |
| Authors |
Fernando Wiecheteck de Souza, Maurício Veloso Brun, Andrigo Barboza de Nardi, Rafael Ricardo Huppes, Carolina Quarterone, Talita Mariana Morata Raposo, Priscila Natasha Kasper, Marília Teresa de Oliveira, Rogério Luizari Guedes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#1,057
of 2,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,886
of 210,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.