↓ Skip to main content

Digital-image analysis to predict weight and yields of boneless subprimal beef cuts

Overview of attention for article published in Scientia Agricola, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Digital-image analysis to predict weight and yields of boneless subprimal beef cuts
Published in
Scientia Agricola, May 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0103-90162003000200028
Authors

Gustavo Adolfo Teira, Eduardo Tinois, Roberto de Alencar Lotufo, Pedro Eduardo de Felício

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2005.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#66
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,708
of 54,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them