↓ Skip to main content

Plant regeneration from proroplasts of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) via somatic embryogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Scientia Agricola, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant regeneration from proroplasts of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) via somatic embryogenesis
Published in
Scientia Agricola, December 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0103-90162003000400012
Authors

Mariza Monteiro, Beatriz Appezzato-da-Glória, Maria José Valarini, Carlos Alberto de Oliveira, Maria Lucia Carneiro Vieira

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#66
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,085
of 142,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them