↓ Skip to main content

Relationship among social support, treatment adherence and metabolic control of diabetes mellitus patients

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship among social support, treatment adherence and metabolic control of diabetes mellitus patients
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, April 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0104-11692012000100008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian Cristiane Gomes-Villas Boas, Milton Cesar Foss, Maria Cristina Foss de Freitas, Ana Emília Pace

Abstract

This cross-sectional and quantitative study aimed to analyze the relationship among social support, adherence to non-pharmacological (diet and physical exercise) and pharmacological treatments (insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic medication) and clinical and metabolic control of 162 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Data were collected through instruments validated for Brazil. Social support was directly correlated with treatment adherence. Adherence to non-pharmacological treatment was inversely correlated with body mass index, and medication adherence was inversely correlated with diastolic blood pressure. There were no associations between social support and clinical and metabolic control variables. Findings indicate that social support can be useful to achieve treatment adherence. Studies with other designs should be developed to broaden the analysis of relations between social support and other variables.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 2 2%
Researcher 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 51 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 52 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#160
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,583
of 173,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them