You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Active cutaneous warming systems to prevent intraoperative hypothermia: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0104-11692012000100024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa de Brito Poveda, Edson Zangiacomi Martinez, Cristina Maria Galvão |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 76% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 76% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#171
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,894
of 173,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.