↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge management in health: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge management in health: a systematic literature review
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, June 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0104-11692012000200024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elyrose Sousa Brito Rocha, Patricia Nagliate, Claudia Elisangela Bis Furlan, Kerson Rocha, Maria Auxiliadora Trevizan, Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes

Abstract

Knowledge has been used as a resource for intelligent and effective action planning in organizations. Interest in research on knowledge management processes has intensified in different areas. A systematic literature review was accomplished, based on the question: what are the contributions of Brazilian and international journal publications on knowledge management in health? The sample totaled 32 items that complied with the inclusion criteria. The results showed that 78% of journals that published on the theme are international, 77% of researchers work in higher education and 65% have a Ph.D. The texts gave rise to five thematic categories, mainly: development of knowledge management systems in health (37.5%), discussion of knowledge management application in health (28.1%) and nurses' function in knowledge management (18.7%).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 12%
Computer Science 15 11%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#128
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,250
of 180,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them