↓ Skip to main content

Natural healers: a review of animal assisted therapy and activities as complementary treatment for chronic conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural healers: a review of animal assisted therapy and activities as complementary treatment for chronic conditions
Published in
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, September 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0104-11692012000300025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reiley Reed, Lilian Ferrer, Natalia Villegas

Abstract

The primary objective of this review is to synthesize the existing literature on the use of animal-assisted therapy and activity (AAT/A) as complementary treatment among people living with chronic disease and to discuss the possible application of this practice among children living with HIV. Relevant databases were searched between March 10 and April 11, 2011, using the words: animal assisted therapy or treatment and chronic conditions or diseases. Thirty-one articles were found and 18 followed the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Research suggests that AAT/A is effective for different patient profiles, particularly children. Interaction with dogs has been found to increase positive behaviors, such as sensitivity and focus, in children with social disabilities. Decreased levels of pain have also been reported among child patients as a result of AAT/A. More research should be done in the area of children living with chronic diseases that require strict adherence to treatment, such as HIV, and on AAT/A's prospective use as an educational tool to teach children about the importance of self-care for their medical conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 4 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 2%
Professor 2 1%
Student > Postgraduate 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 140 82%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 143 84%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#170
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,170
of 187,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.