↓ Skip to main content

Terapia de reposição enzimática para as mucopolissacaridoses I, II e VI: recomendações de um grupo de especialistas brasileiros

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Terapia de reposição enzimática para as mucopolissacaridoses I, II e VI: recomendações de um grupo de especialistas brasileiros
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0104-42302010000300009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Giugliani, Andressa Federhen, Maria Verónica Muñoz Rojas, Taiane Alves Vieira, Osvaldo Artigalás, Louise Lapagesse Carmargo Pinto, Ana Cecília Azevedo, Angelina Xavier Acosta, Carmem Bomfim, Charles Marques Lourenço, Chong Ae Kim, Dafne Horovitz, Denize Bomfim Souza, Denise Norato, Diane Marinho, Durval Palhares, Emerson Santana Santos, Erlane Ribeiro, Eugênia Ribeiro Valadares, Fábio Guarany, Gisele Rosone De Lucca, Helena Pimentel, Isabel Neves de Souza, Jordão Corrêa Neto, José Carlos Fraga, José Eduardo Góes, José Maria Cabral, José Simeonato, Juan Clinton Llerena, Laura Bannach Jardim, Liane de Rosso Giuliani, Luiz Carlos Santana da Silva, Mara Santos, Maria Ângela Moreira, Marcelo Kerstenetzky, Márcia Ribeiro, Nicole Ruas, Patricia Barrios, Paulo Aranda, Rachel Honjo, Raquel Boy, Ronaldo Costa, Carolina Fishinger Moura de Souza, Flavio F Alcântara, Sylvio Gilberto A Avilla, Simone Fagondes, Ana Maria Martins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#174
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,122
of 172,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.