↓ Skip to main content

Worms, slugs and humans: the medical and popular construction of an emerging infectious disease

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Worms, slugs and humans: the medical and popular construction of an emerging infectious disease
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, November 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702011000300016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Márcia Grisotti, Fernando Dias de Avila-Pires

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#1,480
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,680
of 153,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.